Cisco Email Security Appliance Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
Cisco · Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA)
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected device. The vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface of the affected device does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or to access sensitive, browser-based information.
- Exploited
- Not confirmed
- Reports
- 0
- Tactics
- 3/15
How an attack unfolds
Based on MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. mappings. Select a step to see the evidence.How attackers get in
What they do
What can follow
Exploitation timelineDated milestones for a CVE: when it was disclosed, when exploit code became public, when exploitation was confirmed, and when threat reports named it.
Disclosed on 23 Sep 2020. No public exploit code or confirmed exploitation is recorded.
MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. techniques
3 TechniqueOne specific attacker behaviour in MITRE ATT&CK, such as T1190 “Exploit Public-Facing Application”. IDs with a dot, like T1059.004, are sub-techniques., grouped by TacticThe attacker’s goal at a stage of an attack in MITRE ATT&CK, such as Initial Access or Persistence. Each technique belongs to one or more tactics. in kill-chain order 3ExecutionTA0002
Credential AccessTA0006
Detection
0 rules for this CVE · 43 general rules for its techniquesRules for this CVE
0Sigma ruleAn open, vendor-neutral detection rule for log data. Security teams convert Sigma rules into searches for their own SIEM. that reference CVE-2020-3137 directly.CVE-specific rules are not available in this build. Search SigmaHQ ↗
General rules for this CVE’s techniques
These detect the technique in general, not this specific vulnerability.
Malicious LinkT1204.0014 general rules
- Symlink Etc Passwdhightest
- Potential ClickFix Execution Pattern - Registryhighexperimental
- Suspicious ClickFix/FileFix Execution Patternhighexperimental
- Suspicious Execution via macOS Script Editormediumtest
JavaScriptT1059.00729 general rules
- Adwind RAT / JRAThightest
- Adwind RAT / JRAT File Artifacthightest
- Csc.EXE Execution Form Potentially Suspicious Parenthightest
- Cscript/Wscript Uncommon Script Extension Executionhightest
- HackTool - CACTUSTORCH Remote Thread Creationhightest
- HackTool - Koadic Executionhightest
- HTML Help HH.EXE Suspicious Child Processhightest
- JXA In-memory Execution Via OSAScripthightest
Adversary-in-the-MiddleT155710 general rules
- Suspicious Child Process of Notepad++ Updater - GUP.Exehighexperimental
- Uncommon File Created by Notepad++ Updater Gup.EXEhighexperimental
- Potential Suspicious Activity Using SeCEditmediumtest
- ISATAP Router Address Was Setmediumexperimental
- Notepad++ Updater DNS Query to Uncommon Domainsmediumexperimental
- Cisco BGP Authentication Failureslowtest
- Cisco LDP Authentication Failureslowtest
- Huawei BGP Authentication Failureslowtest
Sigma rules © SigmaHQ, Detection Rule License 1.1; linked, not reproduced.