Patchfirst
CVE-2026-43284 Public exploit High · 8.8 EPSS 94.2%

xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags

Linux · Linux

Summary

The flaw is in the Linux kernel's IPv4/IPv6 UDP datagram append paths, which fail to mark pipe pages spliced into skbs as shared, so the ESP input code (used for ESP-in-UDP) can decrypt in place over memory the skb does not own privately. An attacker with local access and low privileges can exploit this, with no user interaction required, to write over data they should not be able to modify, affecting confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system.

Official description · CVE.org

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags MSG_SPLICE_PAGES can attach pages from a pipe directly to an skb. TCP marks such skbs with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG after skb_splice_from_iter(), so later paths that may modify packet data can first make a private copy. The IPv4/IPv6 datagram append paths did not set this flag when splicing pages into UDP skbs. That leaves an ESP-in-UDP packet made from shared pipe pages looking like an ordinary uncloned nonlinear skb. ESP input then takes the no-COW fast path for uncloned skbs without a frag_list and decrypts in place over data that is not owned privately by the skb. Mark IPv4/IPv6 datagram splice frags with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, matching TCP. Also make ESP input fall back to skb_cow_data() when the flag is present, so ESP does not decrypt externally backed frags in place. Private nonlinear skb frags still use the existing fast path. This intentionally does not change ESP output. In esp_output_head(), the path that appends the ESP trailer to existing skb tailroom without calling skb_cow_data() is not reachable for nonlinear skbs: skb_tailroom() returns zero when skb->data_len is nonzero, while ESP tailen is positive. Thus ESP output will either use the separate destination-frag path or fall back to skb_cow_data().

Breakdown
73.9 / 100
Exploited
Yes, in VulnCheck KEV
Reports
0
Tactics
0/15

First seen exploited the day it was disclosed. Public exploit code (PoC-in-GitHub) was available the same day.

  1. DisclosedFirst seen exploitedVulnCheck KEV evidencePublic exploit codePoC-in-GitHubday 0

techniques

No techniques linked

No ATT&CK techniques are linked to this CVE yet. MITRE CTID has not mapped it, and no report passage in the corpus ties it to a technique.

What security researchers reported

Not named in any threat report yet

References

60 links, grouped by NVD tag

vendor-advisory 38

access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17795access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33486access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16180access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21695access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26542access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16176access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23233access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16171
Show 30 moreShow feweraccess.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34098access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16160access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16161access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16157access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16155access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16314access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16062access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19569access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19074access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16202access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16328access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16100access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16312access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16206access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19568access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19225access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16195access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19574access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16201access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16204access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19564access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16061access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19572access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19575access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19573access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19577access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:18025access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16196access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16203access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16254
↑ ↓ chooseEnter openEsc close