SummaryAI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. Generated 29 Oct 2026.
A code injection flaw in the Code Validation endpoint of IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0) lets an attacker inject code that the component then processes. An authenticated attacker with network access and no user interaction can execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files, including credentials, which can enable full system compromise and lateral movement.
Official description · CVE.orgSource dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. Copied from CVE.org.
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files including credentials, enabling complete system compromise and lateral movement.
Priority scorePatchfirst’s 0 to 100 ranking. It adds points for CISA KEV listing, ransomware use, EPSS, threat reports, public exploit code and CVSS. Every CVE page shows the breakdown.Breakdown
73.5 / 100
Exploited
Yes, in VulnCheck KEV
Reports
0
Tactics
0/15
Exploitation timelineDated milestones for a CVE: when it was disclosed, when exploit code became public, when exploitation was confirmed, and when threat reports named it.
Public exploit code (Metasploit) was available the same day.
Patch historyEarlier and later CVEs in the same code, in date order. It shows when a fix was bypassed or incomplete and which version finally fixed it.
7 fixes in langflow over 3 months. The latest fix listed for langflow is 1.10.1.
Fixes in langflowPyPI package, by fixed version. Earlier and later fixes in the same package, not necessarily the same bug.
MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. techniques
No techniques linked
No ATT&CK techniques are linked to this CVE yet. MITRE CTID has not mapped it, and no report passage in the corpus ties it to a technique.
Am I affected? What do I upgrade to?
From GitHub Security Advisories and OSVSourceSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. GitHub Security Advisories and OSV.